Re:Comet is dead, long live websockets
by mbrubeck on Wednesday December 16, 2009 @05:52PM
(#999928)
I think there's a big difference between implementers working in the open to write standards and create test implementations and keep the public informed about the progress toward standardization - as Mozilla, Apple, Opera, and Microsoft are doing with HTML5 and related efforts - as opposed to developing in secret, and launching new features fully-formed into the wild with no chance for discussion and usually no adequate spec, as both Microsoft and Netscape did during the browser wars.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Comet is dead, long live websockets
by tedunangst on Wednesday December 16, 2009 @06:26PM
(#999980)
Agreed. Except for the part where nobody seems to consider these "test" implementations. I'm not so much critical of the process as the apparent developer community attitude/reaction/expectations to a work in progress.
Re:Comet is dead, long live websockets
by mbrubeck on Wednesday December 16, 2009 @06:33PM
(#1000016)
Most of the reactions I see here and on Reddit are dozens of people saying, "Great, I can't use this until it's in IE." I'm not exactly seeing mainstream sites depending on these in-development technologies.