Re:San Francisco: The Worst-Run Big City in the U.S.
by schwit on Wednesday December 16, 2009 @09:23AM
(#998784)
US federal government?
DC government?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco: The Worst-Run Big City in the U.S.
by gibsonf1 on Wednesday December 16, 2009 @10:54AM
(#998991)
It seems a culture has developed where "good" intentions justify anything. There is also a complete causal disconnect between those intentions and the results, and this appears to be happening world-wide. If you say the right words, you can sell any program, regardless of what those same words may have led to in the past in terms of other failed programs. History is evaded and forgotten, it's only intentions that count, not results. sigh.
Re:San Francisco: The Worst-Run Big City in the U.S.
by elblanco on Wednesday December 16, 2009 @02:17PM
(#999509)
The DC government, while still terrible, has vastly improved in the last decade, so much so that it's not even recognizable. This is reflected in the city as well, which in very large swaths are not even recognizable compared to 10 years ago (in a good way).
Re:San Francisco: The Worst-Run Big City in the U.S.
by kingkongreveng_ on Wednesday December 16, 2009 @06:36PM
(#1000022)
I don't think the actual government improved. The city turned around, but that's just because loads of crack heads finally died off, many gangsters are permanently incarcerated, and then yuppies moved in and pushed up property values.