Re:Set Theory and Foundations of Mathematics
by Sirenos on Friday July 31, 2015 @11:15AM
(#9982261)
Isn't Russell's paradox more like a problem with naive set theory? By analogy to a software framework, the paradox would be considered a bug in the framework and say nothing about how useful it is.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
In a sense. But it's interesting because naive set theory appears so simple and natural: it's a concrete example of how human ideas that seem platonic and inviolate can actually be inconsistent.
So it's less like finding a bug in a software framework and more like finding a bug in your understanding of how computers can work.