> Let's not overgeneralize. One bogus claim (about sound quality) does not render the rest of the assertions (mainly about metadata and how accurate information is missing on streaming services) faulty.

No, but one bogus claim asserted strongly from a clear position of ignorance calls the likelihood of his accuracy into question.

It's not an overgeneralization, just a simple matter of credibility. I am less likely to believe he is properly objective in evaluating other criteria as he has completely failed to be objective or rigorous in evaluating this one.