News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by hhandoko on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @01:54AM (#9966535)
We're not discussing about private conversation between two friends. I would be offended if a stranger said that to me. Wouldn't you?

Of course, I can see that this is done for laughs, but not everyone sees that.

Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by seivan on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @02:38AM (#9966718)
This repository doesn't belong to you. For all intents and purposes this is a private conversation in public. Not to mention going out of their way and report it to the Githapo to have them take it down. This is insane. I'm I the only one who sees the insanity of grown adults shitting their pants over vulgarity?!
Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by hhandoko on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @10:55AM (#9969020)
I'm genuinely curious, why do you take the view that this is a private conversation in public?
Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by seivan on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @11:31AM (#9969272)
It's his/her repo, not being sold, not being advertised, not being linked to specific people e.g harassment. It's not for YOU to care about.

It's dongle-joke between two friends in the open. Who the fuck are you to act on that? I don't mean you personally, I mean in general.

Don't compare this to racism or hate-crime like someone else did. That's just watering down words.

Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by hhandoko on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @12:00PM (#9969497)
Got the reference to the dongle-gate now, and for the record I don't agree on public shaming.

The fact that this got into the HN front page and received hundreds of comments means that some people do care and this is an actual issue(?), censorship or what not.

Which is sort of my point. You never know when your repository will become popular for reasons good or bad, but it will reflect on both the author and GitHub.

GitHub will probably get the flak either way: for censorship if they try to force the author to change it, or they might be seen condoning the behaviour if they do not do anything.

Just an aside. I'd like to think that anything people put on GitHub is going to become somewhat like public record. It will stay there long after the project has been abandoned.

Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by hhandoko on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @04:30AM (#9967093)
It is a false analogy though.

If it's just a commit message, then I can see why you would think this construes as a `private` conversation (i.e. message between committers). But, it's also in the README which, by default, the first thing you see when you open up the repository.

The better analogy perhaps, is the author is standing with a signboard containing some offensive language in some corner of a public space.

Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by malft on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @07:55AM (#9967966)
A book in a library, perhaps?
Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by hhandoko on Thursday August 06, 2015 @01:27AM (#10014703)
Yes, and books in libraries can be taken off the shelves for the same reason.
Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by hhandoko on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @10:52AM (#9969005)
Some explanation for the downvotes would be appreciated.
Re:GitHub threatens to shut down a repository for using the ... by duncan_bayne on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @02:51AM (#9966753)
> grown adults

Now there's an unwarranted assumption if ever I saw one ;)