News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Field Study on Technical Debt by InclinedPlane on Tuesday July 28, 2015 @06:08PM (#9964877)
It does suck. Most code sucks. We just get used to it. Doesn't mean it doesn't work, doesn't mean it's not valuable. But it still sucks.

As for architecture being the biggest technical debt problem that should be obvious. Architecture is often the most difficult thing to change after the fact.

Re:A Field Study on Technical Debt by jschwartzi on Tuesday July 28, 2015 @07:39PM (#9965302)
"Good code" is often a euphemism for understandable code.
Re:A Field Study on Technical Debt by InclinedPlane on Tuesday July 28, 2015 @10:08PM (#9965851)
Understandability is an important metric for good code (within reason).