News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by ghuntley on Sunday July 26, 2015 @05:28PM (#9952250)
.NET everywhere, that makes five platforms in less than six months. Windows, Linux by MSFT and OSX, FreeBSD, ARM done out in the open by the community via GitHub pull-requests!
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by mattkrea on Sunday July 26, 2015 @05:39PM (#9952281)
Try using it on Linux or OS X. It isn't there yet.
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by alpb on Sunday July 26, 2015 @05:52PM (#9952317)
It's not ready for end-user yet, I agree on that part. However I experimented with CoreCLR on Linux and managed to get things running. It will most likely take another 6 months or so to polish all those and we'll get ourselves a new cross-platform language.
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by shahid-pk on Sunday July 26, 2015 @05:54PM (#9952320)
So it is on windows too (As the software is in its beta phase) .
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by zamalek on Monday July 27, 2015 @05:46AM (#9954241)
RyuJIT is included with .Net 4.6, which RTM'd last week. It's production quality on Windows. It's probably an older and more stable version of what is on GitHub.
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by shahid-pk on Monday July 27, 2015 @10:37AM (#9955409)
You are correct. Ryujit is ready for production but coreclr has other parts that are different from .net 4.6 and coreclr specefic (like PAL for non windows) which is not production tested yet.
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by rdtsc on Sunday July 26, 2015 @06:14PM (#9952371)
I am using Mono on Linux as a backend service and it works pretty well.
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by mattkrea on Monday July 27, 2015 @02:09PM (#9956912)
Mono has worked fine for me in the past but I was more referring to CoreCLR which is consistently called 'cross-platform' now but is far from it as their own tooling crashes all over the place when attempting to use it (dnu restore, dnu install, dnx . run, etc).
Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by rdtsc on Monday July 27, 2015 @02:47PM (#9957186)
Yeah I know, was just saying there was a viable platform for back-end C# development.

I hope both teams do not duplicate work and are happy to share design and code changes. C#/.NET is nic, I think it still has potential to compete for Linux server back-end services with Go and Java.

Re:CoreCLR building on ARM by novaleaf on Monday July 27, 2015 @10:03AM (#9955228)
C# is my favorite (and most skilled) language, but I moved to Node+Typescript when that came out due to cross platform needs (linux)

I'm actually getting back into C# because of these broadening ecosystems (and hopefully improved OSS community over time!)