News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why does React.js truf other innovations like Cycle.js?. Parent comment

Re:Why does React.js truf other innovations like Cycle.js? by stardrive on Sunday July 26, 2015 @01:29PM (#9951633)
Okay, that explains a lot. It is also ironic because React's rejection of FRP in its completeness has also spawned a very poor substitute they call Flux.

The number of Flux versions that have been churned out as a result is obscene. That is certainly not keeping it beginner-friendly, that is just leading developers astray.

While all the Flux activity may make it look like a lot is going on with React it has instead just wasted everyone's time and kept them from learning a key paradigm like FRP.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why does React.js truf other innovations like Cycle.js? by warmfuzzykitten on Monday July 27, 2015 @07:24PM (#9958646)
I'm not sure how Fiber Reinforced Plastic helps. Seriously, if you want to be understood, define acronyms.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why does React.js truf other innovations like Cycle.js? by stardrive on Tuesday July 28, 2015 @01:22AM (#9959656)
If you want to walk on the wild side and get out of the framework cage and take a breath in fresh air then checkout the following:

https://github.com/channikhabra/yarr/blob/master/complete-tu...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why does React.js truf other innovations like Cycle.js? by stardrive on Tuesday July 28, 2015 @03:33PM (#9963967)
Interesting to see what was meant to be the most glorious and final (to end all Flux wars) version of Flux get revamped with Rx:

https://github.com/jas-chen/rx-redux

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why does React.js truf other innovations like Cycle.js? by stardrive on Tuesday July 28, 2015 @12:25AM (#9959509)
Done, read on:

https://medium.com/@andrestaltz/why-i-cannot-say-frp-but-i-j...

[ Parent | on HN ]