Re:The Facebook Method of Dealing with Complexity
by sp332 on Sunday July 26, 2015 @02:14AM
(#9950336)
Please don't use link shorteners. They just obfuscate the link target.
Re:The Facebook Method of Dealing with Complexity
by github-cat on Saturday July 25, 2015 @10:53PM
(#9949963)
I don't understand why a big company like Google can put some feature online if it's not thoroughly tested or thought. It is because it is a web product and it wants the users to be the testers?
Re:The Facebook Method of Dealing with Complexity
by archgoon on Saturday July 25, 2015 @11:04PM
(#9949993)
What would the testing plan look like?
Re:The Facebook Method of Dealing with Complexity
by icebraining on Monday July 27, 2015 @04:50PM
(#9957913)
Simple procedure: take a large sample (1M pictures or so), tag them with the system and then show each picture with the label to a person (using Mechanical Turk or similar) and ask "is this label offensive?"
Use simple statistics to identify trouble spots.
Take for example the 'Gorilla' issue that Google encountered.
http://nyti.ms/1JlTBab [www.nytimes.com]
Then there was the issue with the bookmarks and suicide categories
http://bit.ly/1JFkmCr [productforums.google.com]
(This one isn't as big of a problem, as the frustration was probably more due to the compulsory usage of the new bookmarks, but it still shows some hazards of auto-categorization).
With social things, it can sometimes be very hard to solve a problem that works for 95% of the population, but doesn't piss off the remaining 5% (often with good justification). Unfortunately, detecting when you're in that situation in the first place is sometimes equivalent to the problem you're trying to solve.