Re:Amazon Is Now Worth More Than Wal-Mart
by datashovel on Friday July 24, 2015 @10:44PM
(#9946341)
Perhaps it would be worth considering that in 1955 household income was generally earned by fewer household members than it is today. Probably close to 1/2. Would it be safe to assume, then, that's approximately how much less the average household bread winner earns in today's world?
EDIT: Here's a fancy chart I just found, thought it might be useful to make the point:
http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2000/feb/wk3/art03.htm
Also I'm not sure if it's a typo, but your comparison between "average income" in 1955 and "median household income" today seems to hurt, not help your point.
How about comparing median individual income, rather than median household income? That median household income in 1955 likely reflected a single individual income, whereas the median income today likely reflects two.
a house cost $22,000 (ie, 5.3x an annual income)
a loaf of bread cost $0.18 (ie, 0.004% of annual income)
Today, a median household income is $51,939 and
a median house costs $188,900 (ie, 3.63x an annual income)
a loaf of bread costs $2.26 (ie, 0.004% of annual income)
Current median income and house prices from Google, loaf of bread cost from http://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/country_result.jsp?coun....
All dollars nominal.