News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Universal asks Google to take down 127.0.0.1 for piracy by wang_li on Friday July 24, 2015 @11:18AM (#9942558)
>I think this is somehow similar to how indigenous people wondered how the white man could possibly think of owning >forests, rivers, and land. They considered Earth unownable, not belonging to anyone but rather people belonging to the >Earth.

A) North America has no indigenous people. B) The people who did live here when the Europeans arrived did have ownership and private property. Sometimes owned by families and sometimes by tribes. And anyone who has even a basic high school education should be aware of the fact that there were Native American nations who controlled and owned territory and would exclude other nations from land use, hunting rights, fishing, etc.

Re:Universal asks Google to take down 127.0.0.1 for piracy by jakob223 on Friday July 24, 2015 @11:39AM (#9942717)
A) Is there any reason the people who lived in North America in the year 1400 shouldn't be considered indigenous? B) Sure, many had ownership and private property. There were those who didn't as well.
Re:Universal asks Google to take down 127.0.0.1 for piracy by tymekpavel on Friday July 24, 2015 @11:35AM (#9942682)
Re:Universal asks Google to take down 127.0.0.1 for piracy by wang_li on Monday July 27, 2015 @02:09PM (#9956914)
Wiktionary disaggress.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/indigenous

Thought I suppose it depends on if you want the word to mean what it means or if you want to use it for some other meaning.