Okay, Feminism, It’s Time We Had a Talk About Empathy (2013)

Re:Okay, Feminism, It’s Time We Had a Talk About Empathy (2013) by myderpyaccount on Friday July 24, 2015 @10:01AM (#9942006)

Yea, but then it doesn't really make sense to argue about anything, because everything can be statically defined in terms of the environment it exists in. The part can be described in terms of the the discrete whole of which it belongs to, minus the part.

I like to complain a lot, about many things, for like an hour, and then I get frustrated without observable resolution. It's all thinking noise, patterns, I prefer to stay at home, I like sleeping, so tired of arguing on the internet.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Okay, Feminism, It’s Time We Had a Talk About Empathy (2013) by detcader on Friday July 24, 2015 @10:34AM (#9942240)

You can talk about different groups of actual physical women who have different types of thought about sex, sexuality, and men, because waves and groups of feminisms actually do exist. I recommend "Gender Inequality" by Judith Lorber as a starting point

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Okay, Feminism, It’s Time We Had a Talk About Empathy (2013) by emodendroket on Friday July 24, 2015 @11:14AM (#9942533)

Right, this is what I meant to say. Arguing with "feminism" is a bit like arguing with "politics" or "ethics" or "philosophy" given how disparate the different strains of it really are. I suppose most people who are arguing against feminism have a specific kind in mind but it doesn't do any good to the reader if you don't explain.

[ Parent | on HN ]