Re:A Father’s Video Game About His Son’s Terminal Cancer
by eropple on Thursday July 23, 2015 @04:12PM
(#9938186)
The use of the word "game" to describe interactive media is an unfortunate one, largely because your reaction is understandable through the parsing of the word--though you must couple it with aggressive rejection of context, as you have in this case, to find strict parsing to be a good way to derive meaning.
Or, put another way: I don't think your distaste for what other people think of the potential of a piece of art oozes through quite sufficiently. Could you perhaps try to be a little bit more of a jerk about it, while doing even more to assume facts not in evidence?
Thanks in advance.
Re:A Father’s Video Game About His Son’s Terminal Cancer
by rawTruthHurts on Friday July 24, 2015 @07:13AM
(#9941158)
"This looks"
- "The gameplay's going to be"
- "it's probably going to"
- "it's not going to be"
and the closing fireworks
"I can't believe"
It must be awesome to know what it takes to make you Beliebe in.
It's supposed to be all literary and pretentious, but it's not going to be fun. I can't believe backers want to waste real money on this garbage.