News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by fridek on Thursday July 23, 2015 @11:04AM (#9936146)
It looks like an amount of space hard to fill with meaningful data. I wonder if they would prevent people from filling it with random junk just for fun.
Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by dragonwriter on Thursday July 23, 2015 @11:17AM (#9936242)
The fact that the offer at its minimum level (which is only free for 1 month, its an "up to 6 months" free deal) requires a commitment to maintain at least 1PB in the system for 12 months (which means you are on the hook for paying for it for the non-free portion of that commitment period), is probably a constraint on sending in junk data just for fun.

As is the fact that you have to migrate the data from non-Google servers -- either your own or some other cloud provider -- to qualify, since you're going to pay for the sending the data, junk or otherwise, you are dumping into it.

Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by 3pt14159 on Thursday July 23, 2015 @11:25AM (#9936309)
Only hard to fill if you're dealing with text only. Say you're building a video copyright detection crawler and you want to store videos from all over the internet.
Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by mprovost on Thursday July 23, 2015 @12:16PM (#9936702)
An HD video stream from Netflix uses about 3GB per hour. So 100PB gives you about 4000 years of content.
Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by 3pt14159 on Friday July 24, 2015 @11:07AM (#9942475)
Just in 2012 alone Google stored 76 PB of content. With higher quality feeds and multiple sites you can quickly start getting beyond the limit.
Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by sebastianavina on Thursday July 23, 2015 @11:21AM (#9936274)
How much space a site like imgur needs?
Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by rugmug5 on Thursday July 23, 2015 @11:58AM (#9936574)
Its a different use case, cold storage vs content delivery...
Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by PuffinBlue on Thursday July 23, 2015 @12:45PM (#9936890)
Not really.

Cold storage is absolutely a necessity when you reach the scale of imgur, unless you want to run the service incredibly inefficiently.

imgur keeps photos forever [0]. To do so without some kind of cold storage infrastructure in place for all the millions of photos that will probably never be seen again, or perhaps at a rate of once per year, would be infrastructure cost suicide.

Facebook faces a similar challenge and has gone in to detail about how it developed a cold storage strategy to deal with it[1].

I would say that for a service like imgur there is probably a level of parity between the amount of importance they need to place on content delivery and on cold storage.

[0] https://help.imgur.com/hc/en-us/articles/201476457-How-long-...

[1] https://code.facebook.com/posts/1433093613662262/-under-the-...

Re:Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availa... by steckerbrett on Thursday July 23, 2015 @02:35PM (#9937619)
That's weird, I've seen conflicting information that says imgur deletes images not accessed for 180 days.