Re:Lufthansa flight has near-miss with drone near Warsaw
by jonchang on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @04:11PM
(#9925401)
Pro tip: Whenever you read "drone" in a news article you can almost always safely replace it with "unmanned aerial vehicle" with no loss of information. Journalists currently do not make the distinction between (semi-)autonomous military "drones" and hobbyist "drones".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lufthansa flight has near-miss with drone near Warsaw
by privong on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @04:24PM
(#9925509)
> Pro tip: Whenever you read "drone" in a news article you can almost always safely replace it with "unmanned aerial vehicle" with no loss of information.
I don't think that replacement _adds_ any additional information, though. As someone who doesn't follow drone/UAV stuff too closely, your suggested substitution does not really clarify the identity of the subject for me.