News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Hackers Remotely Attack a Jeep on the Highway. Parent comment

Re:Hackers Remotely Attack a Jeep on the Highway by freshyill on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @01:04PM (#9923786)
> Think of it more like infecting people with weakened/dead forms of potentially deadly diseases so they will be better protected against that disease.

If these guys want to be regarded as researchers, they need to act like them and be accountable like them. No ethics committee would ever approve a test like this.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hackers Remotely Attack a Jeep on the Highway by Lawtonfogle on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @01:17PM (#9923896)
The IRB as it currently stands it too strict with its regulations. Also, why should the researchers be regulated when the ones producing the things that are initially putting people into danger are not regulated (or are regulated by bureaucrats who couldn't tell you the difference between a buffer overflow and a SQL injection).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hackers Remotely Attack a Jeep on the Highway by danielweber on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @03:39PM (#9925148)
> The IRB as it currently stands it too strict with its regulations.

WTF are you talking about? There is no the IRB.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hackers Remotely Attack a Jeep on the Highway by Lawtonfogle on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @04:21PM (#9925485)
>The IRBs as they currently stand are too strict with their regulations.

Better?

[ Parent | on HN ]