Re:Is growth in the financial sector good for the economy?
by TeMPOraL on Monday July 20, 2015 @02:45PM
(#9918115)
I'm not sure about appeal to nature here; biology seems rather centralized in a lot of aspects. An organism may be made of many cells, but each of those cells have a specific function. Kidney cells do not compute, and brain cells do not contract to pump blood. When a cell starts doing whatever is best for it locally, we call that "cancer". Centralized management arises naturally whenever there's a need for efficiency. So while there's a lot of distribution going on, I wouldn't say centralization is unnatural. It seems common enough on many different scales.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Is growth in the financial sector good for the economy?
by rorykoehler on Monday July 20, 2015 @06:02PM
(#9919418)
The body as you have described it is one node (an organization in my example) in the wider network. For that node to function it needs to have all of its components working in unison but if the node fails other nodes can adapt and the system keeps on chugging.
Re:Is growth in the financial sector good for the economy?
by TeMPOraL on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @07:45AM
(#9921539)
This layering of central and distributed seems common on all levels. If you go up from your example, you have an ecosystem that needs to work in unison. But if it fails, there are always other planets...
Re:Is growth in the financial sector good for the economy?
by rorykoehler on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @08:03PM
(#9926801)
Yes this occurred to me too. Very interesting. At what layer is the economy at naturally?