News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by moron4hire on Monday July 20, 2015 @08:30AM (#9915532)
There is no value to "impressions". Impressions != sales. Sales are the only thing we should be counting as value. Focusing on impressions is how we get click-fraud in the first place.
Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by ryanworl on Monday July 20, 2015 @08:38AM (#9915573)
While sales resulting from ad impressions are important (i.e. direct response ads), wouldn't you also agree ads for establishing branding are important as well?

The vast majority of ads for luxury cars, for example, aren't going to elicit an immediate purchase, but still provide value for the automaker down the line.

Obviously the ads have to eventually lead to sales, but an immediate and trackable sale isn't always an option.

Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by moron4hire on Monday July 20, 2015 @08:45AM (#9915596)
Startups aren't luxury car brands. If you're selling a product or service, I think you establish brand by making happy customers. That first requires a sale.
Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by blowski on Monday July 20, 2015 @08:59AM (#9915671)
> You establish brand by making happy customers. That first requires a sale.

In some cases, that may be right, but in general branding begins the first time someone interacts with your product (or even your industry). If I notice your business name on Google SERPS, I am engaging with your brand.

I didn't really use NewRelic for 2 years after I first heard of it, but I did keep seeing them and speaking to them at events, reading blog posts, etc. Eventually, I signed up and paid for the product. What convinced me to do that was the branding work they did before I became a customer.

Even for freemium products, the business builds a brand to encourage people to invest the effort into signing up. Even government services (e.g. in the UK - the BBC, the NHS) do branding work.

Branding doesn't start at the point the customer enters their credit card.

Lovemarks is a good read on branding - http://www.amazon.co.uk/Lovemarks-Effect-Winning-Consumer-Re...

Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by JupiterMoon on Monday July 20, 2015 @09:00AM (#9915676)
And that first requires reputation. I'm not giving your company my credit card number if I've never heard of it.
Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by moron4hire on Monday July 20, 2015 @09:04AM (#9915703)
You should be able to get your first few sales without any brand identity, just based on the merits of your product. I expect the majority of people reading this site who actually have a project in the works are probably boot-strapping. There is no way they'll be able to spend on "building brand" before they start making sales. Whatever Facebook or Lexus or NHS or whomever does has no baring on us, we are fundamentally different beasts.

Also, you're not sending me your credit card number, you're sending it to Stripe, or Amazon, or PayPal. Regardless, I think you severely overestimating how cautious people are with their credit card info.

Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by tankenmate on Monday July 20, 2015 @09:43AM (#9915946)
The bulk of the market are conscious of these issues; the "leading tail" of the market, the early adopters much less so. Obviously the "lagging tail" of the market won't buy without cash and without personally knowing the seller and inspecting the goods in person before buying. Branding however is for the rest of the market.
Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by exelius on Monday July 20, 2015 @10:06AM (#9916077)
No, but if you're a brand marketer, you need to be able to perform demand planning. If $(ad spend) > (impressions) * (conversion rate) * (price) then you do it. You can't get around counting impressions. But it's not important that impressions are accurate; just that they behave roughly like they have in the past.

What the article is saying is that there's an upper limit on the amount of fraud that can be perpetrated without showing up in other metrics, and at current prices, brand marketers just don't care. Because brand marketers don't care about impressions; they care about P&L at the brand level. If a banner ad campaign drives top line brand revenue, that's all they need it to do.

Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by justuk on Monday July 20, 2015 @09:38AM (#9915917)
Click fraud is the opposite of impression based advertising. Click fraud is when the bad guys encourage people to sign up for services or click on links that offer a sales based bounty and are rewarded for their actions.

Impression based brand advertising is a different model to click based lead advertising. The former places all the risk and work on the adveriser, the later pushes it towards the publisher. If you run a website that's hugely popular and don't want to waste your resources on other business's ad campaigns then selling by impression is the only sensible option.

Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by maroonblazer on Monday July 20, 2015 @09:51AM (#9915983)
How can I buy a product or service I'm not even aware exists? That's the value of display advertising.
Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by dublinben on Monday July 20, 2015 @10:23AM (#9916204)
Do you only hear about good products from paid advertisements?
Re:Banner “Fraud” Doesn’t Matter by moron4hire on Monday July 20, 2015 @10:19AM (#9916178)
There are more ways to advertise than online.