PEP 0448 – Additional Unpacking Generalizations

Re:PEP 0448 – Additional Unpacking Generalizations by deckiedan on Saturday July 18, 2015 @10:16AM (#9907588)

    def L(*vargs):
        return vargs

tada.

    >>> stuff = ['c','d','e']

    >>> L('a','b', *stuff)
    ('a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e')

Just like that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:PEP 0448 – Additional Unpacking Generalizations by indosauros on Saturday July 18, 2015 @11:16AM (#9907721)

    >>> L(*stuff, 'a', 'b')
    SyntaxError: only named arguments may follow *expression

    >>> L(*stuff, *stuff)
    SyntaxError: invalid syntax

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:PEP 0448 – Additional Unpacking Generalizations by deckiedan on Sunday July 19, 2015 @03:12AM (#9910310)

Good point... yes, having it language-level supported does add a lot of good stuff...

[ Parent | on HN ]