"Your honor, clearly you can see that our services are so impartial as to flag our own email..."
Something tells me that probably wouldn't work.
If I were on the jury, I'd definitely buy it. Their counsel would have to really bone up the argument that it was such equal treatment, they were flagging their own messages. And the prosecution would have to really stretch things, probably entering into conspiratorial territory in order to make a case.
Then again, I've found myself perplexed by jury decisions on tech-related cases more than once. Although having sat on a jury, I can see how such decisions might be made.
I realize that everything takes time to implement, and developer time is not infinite, but this one seems like pretty low-hanging fruit.
Good job, Google!!
those emails were sent from [email protected]
Why is this message in Spam? It has a from address in accounts.l.google.com but has failed accounts.l.google.com's required tests for authentication.
what are required tests for authentication?
this email is sent by google when logging in google account from a new machine. they tag their own email as spam ...
Hi xxx, Your Google Account [email protected] was just used to sign in from Chrome on Windows.
Don't recognize this activity? Review your recently used devices now.
Why are we sending this? We take security very seriously and we want to keep you in the loop on important actions in your account. We were unable to determine whether you have used this browser or device with your account before. This can happen when you sign in for the first time on a new computer, phone or browser, when you use your browser's incognito or private browsing mode or clear your cookies, or when somebody else is accessing your account. Best,
The Google Accounts team