Re:Ask HN: Good Python codebases to read?
by dynamicdispatch on Thursday July 16, 2015 @02:45PM
(#9899135)
I've had to read the source of boto since there were some boto exceptions I was seeing in stack traces in the fabric deploy process - and ugh, I found the code to be not very intuitive and the documentation poor. Anyone else run into the same issues with boto?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I've found the documentation (not the codebase itself) to be very hit-or-miss. Some components are very well documented, some not at all. Presumably due to maturity of different parts of the stack and the Boto library, but still frustrating from an end-user perspective.