Re:CrunchPad Federal Lawsuit Filed; Some Additional Thoughts
by jonknee on Friday December 11, 2009 @11:02AM
(#989882)
I shed no tears when a lawyer doesn't think to make a contract and gets burned. How many times has he been on the other side skewering people who did the same thing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:CrunchPad Federal Lawsuit Filed; Some Additional Thoughts
by cma on Friday December 11, 2009 @07:12PM
(#990852)
It isn't likely that he didn't think to make a contract. More like he wanted better terms and thought he could jerk them around, and they thought the same thing. In the end they both win a dead product.
Re:CrunchPad Federal Lawsuit Filed; Some Additional Thoughts
by rbanffy on Friday December 11, 2009 @02:40PM
(#990296)
Well... Not only he didn't get that much burned, he is suing Fusion Garage out of existence.
And, unless most of the article is correct, he is also slandering them pretty bad.
Re:CrunchPad Federal Lawsuit Filed; Some Additional Thoughts
by jonknee on Friday December 11, 2009 @04:04PM
(#990465)
Filing gets you nothing, he has to win the suit which will be really tricky because he didn't spell it out on paper first. Even then what does he have? Less money and no product. Not to mention looking extraordinarily incompetent in front of the public. Simply having a contract in place would have made this cut and dry.
Re:CrunchPad Federal Lawsuit Filed; Some Additional Thoughts
by rbanffy on Saturday December 12, 2009 @10:52AM
(#991616)
Filing may get them nothing, but he can get an injunction that prevents FG from launching the product and thus getting funding for a coming legal battle. I bet the shortage of money would make them more amenable to Arrington's allegations of who owns the IP...
Looks increasingly like MA found some company who could develop a product and that could be bullied out of the deal when it's ready to be taken away.