Re:Swift Functors, Applicatives, and Monads in Pictures
by quchen on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @02:07PM
(#9892991)
join is one possible fundamental monadic operation. You can also define monads in other ways, such as endofunctors such that the Kleisli structure forms a category. In this case, you have the identity arrow (called return in Haskell) and Kleisli composition (<=< in Haskell) as fundamental operations. Neither of these is more fundamental than the other. You can convert back and forth,
f >=> g = \x -> f x >>= g
m >>= f = (f <=< id) m
join = (>>= id)
m >>= f = join (fmap f m)
So if you're focused on composing monadic operations, thinking about it in terms of >=> is often a good idea.
char :: Char -> Parser Char x :: (Parser Char) let y = fmap (char . toUpper) x :: (Parser (Parser Char))
It's a parser which creates a new parser out of the input it consumes.
I do think that fmap/pure/join is the easier to understand set of defining functions for monads.