News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PG: Arc Likely To Be Open-Sourced This Winter by ivankirigin on Tuesday January 15, 2008 @03:06PM (#98802)
Yah, I assumed they were doing something fancy, not knowing what they actually are doing.

I'm told a great place to read good code, both Python and C, is to read the code that makes Python.

Re:PG: Arc Likely To Be Open-Sourced This Winter by tjr on Wednesday January 16, 2008 @02:11PM (#99389)
Yes, C is another good example. The language is fairly small, and it's not terribly difficult to learn the language itself and write your own programs. But to be able to look at an arbitrary piece of C code and understand all of the implications is another matter entirely.

This is true of any language to some degree, although some are worse than others, and if the code was purposefully written in some non-traditional way it can be even harder.

Re:PG: Arc Likely To Be Open-Sourced This Winter by ivankirigin on Wednesday January 16, 2008 @03:47PM (#99432)
It is most certainly not true about C++.
Re:PG: Arc Likely To Be Open-Sourced This Winter by tjr on Wednesday January 16, 2008 @06:36PM (#99536)
Touche'; I should have grouped my sentences differently. C++ is not a small, easy-to-learn language.
Re:PG: Arc Likely To Be Open-Sourced This Winter by ivankirigin on Thursday January 17, 2008 @01:35AM (#99667)
I'm reminded of Duff's Device http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duff%27s_device

  send(to, from, count)
  register short *to, *from;
  register count;
  {
    register n = (count + 7) / 8;
    switch (count % 8) {
    case 0: do { *to = *from++;
    case 7:      *to = *from++;
    case 6:      *to = *from++;
    case 5:      *to = *from++;
    case 4:      *to = *from++;
    case 3:      *to = *from++;
    case 2:      *to = *from++;
    case 1:      *to = *from++;
               } while (--n > 0);
    }
  }