Ask HN: What's fair equity for cofounder without day-to-day responsibilities?
We’ve since rented a building and hired employees. While we're barely sustainable at this point, if I went full-time I would be making 1/3 of what I make now and I would lose all benefits. I truly LOVE my day job and have realized that I’m not passionate about working at the startup. It's successful side tangent in an arena we both know little about. I would also have no work/life balance. I've also realized that I don't work very well in business relationship dynamic that he and I have. He wants to pursue it, I no longer want day-to-day responsibility.
Obviously, a 50/50 split isn't fair any longer. We renegotiated our split based on amount of time spent working on the project-which I thought was a little dubious given the amount of time, money, hundreds of hours of design/engineering work (both our names are on the patent), and the fact that it took us both to start up. Either way, I obliged now own a little less than 10%.
He's now seeking outside investment and asked me to sell all/most of my shares back to him (at a VERY low valuation) because he thinks it’s unattractive to potential investors to see a large stakeholder who isn’t full-time.
Questions:
1. Does he have a legitimate concern about the large stakeholder issue? I feel like I've already let go of too much.
2. If so, what percentage would be considered "small enough"? I definitely don't want to throw away all my shares.
Thanks!
I have advised many founders in how to split equity. Think of it this way: if you had started at 50/50 each with the standard vesting, and you had quit early on (6 months to a year later), your 50% would turn into 6.25% to 12%. Pretty much exactly where you are now.
I don't think you need to re-negotiate. Once your founder raises more money, you'll soon be diluted closer to 5%. Nothing that an outside investor would worry much about, unless they are not seasoned investors.
Don't change anything.
Serious investors will look at the potential of the company and the potential of their return, the amount of time another shareholder spends is secondary to it.
Good luck!
from an investor point of view, i wouldnt see it as a problem at all.