Re:Skin too fragile to touch
by juliangregorian on Sunday July 12, 2015 @11:26AM
(#9873743)
What a weird and arbitrary (and absurdly anthropocentric) standard for who is regarded as valuable.
You could say the same about any morality, though I don't see why you think it's arbitrary or anthropocentric. For one, I am talking about the properties of information, which isn't arbitrary. And you could certainly build a machine, find another animal, or locate an ecosystem that has more value than humans.
Especially when you've got a world of absurd religious philosophies to compare it to.
Re:Skin too fragile to touch
by juliangregorian on Sunday July 12, 2015 @12:59PM
(#9874057)
> For one, I am talking about the properties of information, which isn't arbitrary.
I dunno, do chickens agree with you on that?
Chickens do not have that potential to be valuable decision-makers. That is the only reason it is acceptable to breed them for death.