Re:Science is dead
by tensor on Wednesday December 09, 2009 @11:45PM
(#987316)
I'd like to add that scientific consensus is often a consensus of evidence, not a consensus of opinion as it so often is in politics.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Science is dead
by pwnstigator on Thursday December 10, 2009 @12:15PM
(#988121)
Excellent point.
However, people sometimes misuse the phrase "scientific consensus". For example, on the near-death experience, it's often said that "scientific consensus" is that the NDE is a biochemical phenomenon. Wrong. There is no scientific or medical consensus on that issue.
The discrepancy regarding "scientific consensus" is much like that surrounding word "theory" in science, which has a precise meaning different from the colloquial definition. "Theory of Universal Graviation" and "Theory of Evolution" involve a much stronger definition of this word than "conspiracy theory". Evolution isn't "just a theory", in the colloquial sense of "theory"; it's an extremely well-supported probable explanation.