News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Schneier's response to Eric Schmidt by mechanical_fish on Wednesday December 09, 2009 @11:44PM (#987311)
I stand corrected. He did not literally say "the innocent have nothing to hide". He literally said this:

If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

I'm not convinced, however, that there's a reassuring amount of daylight between these two statements.

Re:Schneier's response to Eric Schmidt by jfager on Thursday December 10, 2009 @01:01PM (#988197)
Except that the former is plainly false, and the latter is pretty much indisputable provided you aren't walking up to the phrase with a preconceived notion that it's codespeak for something more sinister.

I should add that I very much agree with what you said about Google being in a position to make a much stronger stand for privacy rights in this country. I equally think that this is a pointless little shitstorm that detracts from the larger issue by making privacy advocacy look like petty language lawyering.

Re:Schneier's response to Eric Schmidt by nailer on Thursday December 10, 2009 @09:19AM (#987855)
And furthermore: Schmidt did not say the quote was being used out of context, despite all the publicity.