Examining the Legendary Hurd Kernel (2008)

Re:Examining the Legendary Hurd Kernel (2008) by InTheArena on Saturday July 11, 2015 @03:07PM (#9871130)

I sit on our company's architecture review board, and we do a pass on every product that the company does. There are three links that I regularly have grounds to give: The "Linux is obsolete" Debate - http://www.oreilly.com/openbook/opensources/book/appa.html Taligents Guide to Designing Object Oriented Software: http://www.amazon.com/Taligents-Guide-Designing-Programs-Obj... And "The Critique" http://walfield.org/papers/200707-walfield-critique-of-the-G...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Examining the Legendary Hurd Kernel (2008) by nickpsecurity on Sunday July 12, 2015 @12:15AM (#9872561)

And yet, the monolithic systems (esp Linux) proved to have all the problems predicted. Shapiro did a nice job showing how ridiculous Linus's claim is in Round 2 of the debate, which you left off:

http://www.coyotos.org/docs/misc/linus-rebuttal.html

Can't help but repeat a main point: there are many high assurance (reliability or security) microkernel-based systems that have been fielded but not a single one has achieved this based on the monolithic model Linus loves. QED.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Examining the Legendary Hurd Kernel (2008) by Cymen on Saturday July 11, 2015 @05:58PM (#9871720)

The Taligent book is online too: https://root.cern.ch/TaligentDocs/TaligentOnline/DocumentRoo...

[ Parent | on HN ]