Re:The Evolution of Go
by AnimalMuppet on Friday July 10, 2015 @12:18PM
(#9864841)
Sorry, I'm not trying to be dense, but:
> No, you have to write their code (concrete implementation for a new type) manually.
Say we're talking about a sort function. Are you saying that I have to write both sort(Foo) and sort(Bar), rather than simply writing sort(SomeInterfaceSharedByFooAndBar)?
I presume you're not just saying that I have to write the code for Foo and Bar; I don't know of anything that will save me from that.
> No, you have to write their code (concrete implementation for a new type) manually.
Say we're talking about a sort function. Are you saying that I have to write both sort(Foo) and sort(Bar), rather than simply writing sort(SomeInterfaceSharedByFooAndBar)?
I presume you're not just saying that I have to write the code for Foo and Bar; I don't know of anything that will save me from that.