Re:Ruby Is Defined by Terrible Tools
by dragonwriter on Wednesday July 08, 2015 @04:55PM
(#9854512)
No, nor have I missed the particular function described working with Ruby.
But, OTOH, I am aware that its possible to do good-enough-for-many-uses implementations of things for which a complete, general solution is impossible, including the function described.
But, OTOH, I am aware that its possible to do good-enough-for-many-uses implementations of things for which a complete, general solution is impossible, including the function described.