Re:The Use of Name Spaces in Plan 9 (1993)
by vezzy-fnord on Sunday July 05, 2015 @02:11PM
(#9834336)
Amoeba indeed had cool ideas, like most things A.S. Tanenbaum has worked on, but I always thought Sprite was more novel.
I haven't looked into Amoeba too deeply, I must admit, but other than its support for network transparency and single system imaging from heterogenous machines, I don't think it's very Plan 9-ish at all.
Re:The Use of Name Spaces in Plan 9 (1993)
by nickpsecurity on Sunday July 05, 2015 @03:25PM
(#9834612)
I'm glad you brought Sprite up. Been meaning to look at it closely. Far as Amboeba vs Plan 9, that was intentional on my part: get HN readers seeing something a bit different that happened in the same field. Probably just phrased the comment badly again (sigh).
Sprite homepage for HN readers following along:
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/Projects/CS/sprite/spr...
Edit to add: The retrospective is definitely worth reading. I think most administrators, to this day, have it harder in some ways than people running Sprite due to their clever design choices in networking, storage, and single-system-image.
[1] http://www.cs.vu.nl/pub/amoeba/amoeba.html
[2] http://www.cs.vu.nl/~philip/globe/