New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants

Re:New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants by Grue3 on Friday July 03, 2015 @01:28PM (#9826818)

How can you even mix rich and the poor in the same building? Assuming both rich and poor have to pay the same rent, it would be either too much for the poor, or "too cheap" for the rich (meaning, they will move to a more upscale property). The "segregation" just happens naturally.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants by sp332 on Friday July 03, 2015 @01:32PM (#9826836)

receive a tax break for offering some units to low-income tenants

Literally the second sentence of the article. On top of that, units in the same building often cost vastly different amounts of money depending on the height, the view, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants by Grue3 on Friday July 03, 2015 @01:45PM (#9826912)

I was talking in general, not New York specifically. Of course if a third party (the government in this case) basically pays the difference, anything can happen. But it seems like it's because you can't just build new housing in New York City, so existing houses have to accomodate the poor, which is a pretty unique situation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants by peloton on Friday July 03, 2015 @02:29PM (#9827166)

There's typically an application process for the low income units. The rents are much cheaper than for the regular units. http://ny.curbed.com/archives/2012/06/05/city_now_accepting_...

I've seen buildings with separate doors and some without that have low income units. Even in the same building, the low income units are not as nice (e.g. no in-unit washer dryer, no stainless steel appliances, cheaper fixtures). Also, some buildings only provide keys to the gym and other common areas for non-low income. But I think they got in trouble for that and may have stopped.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants by jsprogrammer on Friday July 03, 2015 @04:21PM (#9827723)

>How can you even mix rich and the poor in the same ship? Assuming both rich and poor have to pay the same fare, it would be either too much for the poor, or "too cheap" for the rich (meaning, they will use a more exclusive vessel). The "segregation" just happens naturally.

My guess is that the rents in the building are not uniform.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants by serve_yay on Friday July 03, 2015 @01:29PM (#9826820)

Wow.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants by penprogg on Friday July 03, 2015 @01:44PM (#9826908)

Wow, it's like you didn't even take the time to process what he said and decided to get outraged anyway.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants by serve_yay on Friday July 03, 2015 @01:57PM (#9826966)

I agree someone wasn't reading, but I don't think it was me!

[ Parent | on HN ]