News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dutch universities start their Elsevier boycott plan by viraptor on Thursday July 02, 2015 @06:45PM (#9822240)
> having to constantly worry about the next year's impact factor

I'm confused by this bit. Isn't impact factor just a complex indicator of the amount of citations, so really an indicator of the quality of the journal? Why is it "worrying about impact factor", rather than "worrying about publication quality"?

This reminds me of the pleasing the shareholders vs. trying to run a successful company disconnect.

Re:Dutch universities start their Elsevier boycott plan by dougmccune on Thursday July 02, 2015 @06:52PM (#9822275)
Your analogy is spot on. It's a perverse incentive system. It doesn't make any rational sense, but that's the way it is. Even more ironically, the impact factor of open access journals matters even more than for paywall journals. Once a paywall journal is established it's fairly stable. If it loses its impact factor that's bad, but doesn't mean the death of the journal. But with an OA journal if you have an impact factor and then lose it, your submissions drop off a cliff, which directly ties into your revenue, and that will often be the actual death of the journal.