Re:5 out of 7 .io nameservers appear to be down
by falcolas on Thursday July 02, 2015 @08:45AM
(#9818437)
To be fair, even if it was "amateur hour", it was apparently mitigated by practices which kept two of the seven up.
I've watched other companies do far worse.
Re:5 out of 7 .io nameservers appear to be down
by lewisheadden on Thursday July 02, 2015 @09:28AM
(#9818668)
Try using +norec in dig and you'll get a response.
Re:5 out of 7 .io nameservers appear to be down
by sajal83 on Thursday July 02, 2015 @09:50AM
(#9818820)
Interesting, it works locally for me when using +norec (i.e. Recursion Desired = false)... but is there a valid reason for an authoritative to to respond anything if RD is set to true? FYI Pulse always sets RD=true
The reason there are multiple DNS servers is in case one/some of them have problems. There are two other root servers for the .io. zone that are apparently functioning just fine. That means the overall system is working as intended, no?
Also, I don't think we know (yet) why five of the seven are down. If it turns out to be some "amateur hour" mistake then, sure, I could see it being used against ICB. If, however, the underlying issue is/was out of their control, then why should they be penalized?
ETA: It appears that the name servers are actually "up". They respond to ICMP echo requests but aren't answering queries: