News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Microservice Trade-Offs. Parent comment

Re:Microservice Trade-Offs by jessaustin on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @05:56PM (#9815494)
If a library dictates a "technology stack", then maybe it's more of a "framework" than a "library"? I think we're supposed to deprecate those now.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microservice Trade-Offs by icebraining on Thursday July 02, 2015 @12:40AM (#9816878)
A library dictates a stack since it's hard to use a Python library in an Haskell application.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microservice Trade-Offs by jessaustin on Thursday July 02, 2015 @07:34PM (#9822444)
Many libraries have functional equivalents in other languages. Is there some python library that's so awesome it would have no equivalent in Haskell? (If you say "NumPy" I think you're veering into framework territory.)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microservice Trade-Offs by codygman on Thursday July 02, 2015 @08:12PM (#9822588)
Interestingly I found these for using python libraries in Haskell:

https://github.com/Russell91/pyfi

[ Parent | on HN ]