Re:“Systemd should not default to using time{1,2,3,4}.google...
by vezzy-fnord on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @10:32AM
(#9812038)
but it doesn't provide infrastructure
...How does it not? That's the point of systemd: provide a GNU/Linux middleware with lots of policy decisions on the structure of distros to supposedly bring integration and uniformity benefits.
The fact that it's core infrastructure but heavily delves outside of mechanism is what makes it so controversial.
Re:“Systemd should not default to using time{1,2,3,4}.google...
by bjourne on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @10:54AM
(#9812192)
I meant physical server infrastructure. Not the allegorical infrastructure formed by Linux packages communicating. Yes, I know the infrastructure word is horribly overloaded.
...How does it not? That's the point of systemd: provide a GNU/Linux middleware with lots of policy decisions on the structure of distros to supposedly bring integration and uniformity benefits.
The fact that it's core infrastructure but heavily delves outside of mechanism is what makes it so controversial.