It would be interesting to see estimates of the cost of those greenhouse gasses, in terms of extinct species, effort to clean up the atmosphere, or other expensive/bad things that can happen when you claim that increasingly using energy in non-efficient ways is just fine. Are these costs higher or lower than the value of the money created?
Perhaps BTC is sustainable, but your argument certainly does not refute the article's claim - at least, until we've already solved our energy & pollution problems.
"Assigning" your solar cells to BC is meaningless.
Many (most?) power companies around the world don't simply buy power from solar cells at the same price they sell. Also you may very well be taxed on your income from selling electricity back to the grid, so it's not that simple.