Re:Why not port Linux kernel to Common Lisp?
by thwarted on Sunday December 06, 2009 @06:01PM
(#980308)
This is a refreshing change from the "The Linux kernel should use C++ more" that crops up every so often.
Despite it's refreshingness, it's still tiring to see these kinds of questions/goals. The Linux kernel is written what it is written in, by the people who wrote it. If you think it's a worthwhile thing to have it written in something else, patches will be entertained, and baring that, forks are acceptable.
Despite it's refreshingness, it's still tiring to see these kinds of questions/goals. The Linux kernel is written what it is written in, by the people who wrote it. If you think it's a worthwhile thing to have it written in something else, patches will be entertained, and baring that, forks are acceptable.