Re:U.S. Supreme Court Denies Google's Request to Appeal Orac...
by andrewguenther on Monday June 29, 2015 @09:44PM
(#9802360)
Google didn't want to pay licensing fees to Oracle so they wrote their own implementation of the entire Java language. Not only did they write their own implementation of the standard library, they wrote their own compiler and virtual machine. Does that make sense? I can see how my original statement was unclear.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court Denies Google's Request to Appeal Orac...
by carussell on Monday June 29, 2015 @10:22PM
(#9802496)
I'm familiar with the background of the case, I just don't understand what you mean by, "took the syntax as well". Android programs are written in Java-the-language. That fact neither enlarges nor diminishes the severity of Google's actions here.
I don't understand what this is supposed to mean, and I don't see anyone else asking. So could you explain?