Why Wolfram Mathematica did not use Lisp (2002)

Re:Why Wolfram Mathematica did not use Lisp (2002) by laichzeit0 on Monday June 29, 2015 @12:25PM (#9799073)

Wolfram is extremely cocky for a bald man.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Wolfram Mathematica did not use Lisp (2002) by castis on Monday June 29, 2015 @01:00PM (#9799308)

I'll bite.

What does hair (or lack thereof) have to do with anything?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Wolfram Mathematica did not use Lisp (2002) by mikerichards on Monday June 29, 2015 @01:05PM (#9799345)

For some reason, that's actually a pretty funny troll. He should've added on to it though. "If he's so smart, he would've found the cure for baldness already".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Wolfram Mathematica did not use Lisp (2002) by nicarus1984 on Monday June 29, 2015 @02:05PM (#9799790)

Grass doesn't grow on a busy street...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Wolfram Mathematica did not use Lisp (2002) by DonHopkins on Monday June 29, 2015 @08:58PM (#9802178)

Parts of him are actually quite hairy. But fortunately, just like his theory of everything, he's doesn't bother telling people, since doctors wouldn't understand it. [1]

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9798776

[ Parent | on HN ]