News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by vetinari on Monday June 29, 2015 @06:06AM (#9797216)
It's easier to sell one bigger package than several smaller.

I would not be surprised, if the 505,000 ounces in 20oz packages cost less to produce in 1950 prices, than 480,000 ounces in 6oz packages. (Just one physical package, not three separate).

Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by ams6110 on Monday June 29, 2015 @11:01AM (#9798486)
It's a set of tradeoffs. The 6oz bottles were (I think) returnable. Even better than recycling, they only needed to be washed/sterilized to re-use. I'm old enough to remember Coke and other brands in returnable bottles up to 16oz.

They were heavy. The transportation costs savings with the lighter plastic bottles (combined with maybe the raw materials savings, and savings not having to transport, handle, wash, and sterilize the emptys) made plastic more economical than returnable glass.

Manufacturing cost for glass bottles almost certainly higher than plastic. You have to melt either sand or recycled crushed glass which takes a lot of energy.

Some jurisdictions do have returnable plastic bottles. They are much heavier than the disposable ones but still lighter than glass.

Interestingly for some reason beer in plastic bottles has never caught on, it's mostly sold in glass bottles and cans.

Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by carussell on Monday June 29, 2015 @12:04PM (#9798924)
And then neither has canned water caught on, despite all the hand-wringing about waste from water bottles.

http://www.jwz.org/blog/2015/06/banning-bottled-water-increa...

Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by LordKano on Monday June 29, 2015 @01:04PM (#9799340)
What I love about that study is that it's confirmation of what should be common sense. People purchase disposable bottles because of the convenience.

This is just my opinion but I don't believe that the first step should be trying to regulate people into better behavior, you have to educate them.

Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by cpwright on Monday June 29, 2015 @11:36AM (#9798724)
At Islanders hockey games, beer is sold in plastic bottles with the cap taken off.
Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by tbomb on Monday June 29, 2015 @01:06PM (#9799351)
This has been a growing trend in many arenas and stadiums in Florida too. I've seen them in at least 5 different venues across the state now.
Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by pimlottc on Monday June 29, 2015 @01:07PM (#9799366)
This is pretty standard for bottled water at music festivals as well.
Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by peterfirefly on Monday June 29, 2015 @06:54AM (#9797348)
Plastic bottles instead of glass bottles probably also help. You don't have to be nearly as careful when you handle plastic bottles.

(I /think/ they are also cheaper to produce.)

Re:Why Coke Cost a Nickel for 70 Years (2012) by csn on Monday June 29, 2015 @08:20AM (#9797580)
And considerably lighter. Good for logistics.