You don't need to daemonize

Re:You don't need to daemonize by scurvy on Sunday June 28, 2015 @06:24PM (#9795353)

I have an axe to grind about the way it was introduced. Fedora and Red Hat massively mis-managed it. Previously, they introduced various things in tech preview releases, and it either stayed or went with subsequent releases.

systemd was thrust upon us by an axe-grinding developer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You don't need to daemonize by rodgerd on Sunday June 28, 2015 @07:42PM (#9795628)

So, stupid politics rather than technical merit.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You don't need to daemonize by hactually on Sunday June 28, 2015 @07:18PM (#9795526)

What axe did they grind? I've got only good things to say about systemd so perhaps I can't understand the issue?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You don't need to daemonize by icebraining on Sunday June 28, 2015 @06:35PM (#9795383)

Sounds like your problem is with Red Hat, not systemd.

[ Parent | on HN ]