Re:My Parents Were Home-Schooling Anarchists (2011)
by lordnacho on Sunday June 28, 2015 @05:59PM
(#9795277)
Simple explanation: decreasing return + noise means you can't tell whether someone has been doing something for 10 years or 13.
Re:My Parents Were Home-Schooling Anarchists (2011)
by egypturnash on Sunday June 28, 2015 @06:27PM
(#9795360)
> ...to the difficulty turning them off of reading later on.
Wait. What?
Who the hell thinks that making kids stop liking to read is a thing that should happen?
Re:My Parents Were Home-Schooling Anarchists (2011)
by jacalata on Sunday June 28, 2015 @06:47PM
(#9795424)
I think that sentence meant "the difficulty of reading at a young age makes them less interested in reading when they are older"
Re:My Parents Were Home-Schooling Anarchists (2011)
by egypturnash on Sunday June 28, 2015 @08:03PM
(#9795690)
Hmm, oh yeah, I think you're right.
(Personally I was reading by the time I was four without my parents doing anything more than reading to me on a regular basis, and maybe setting a good model by reading a lot themselves.)
>it's "how soon does this kid have the tool to satisfy their natural curiosity about things that require more than someone telling them about it?"
I don't think that's true at all, an average 4-7 year old who can read, cannot read to a level where they can learn topics complex enough that they "require more than someone telling them about it."
A kid who learns to read at 7 will catch up to the kid who learned at 4, so that by the time they are ready to teach themselves on their own through reading, there won't be a difference.
https://deyproject.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/readinginkind...