News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ICANN's assault on personal and small business privacy by Animats on Sunday June 28, 2015 @02:17AM (#9792617)
I'm in favor of "outright banning the use of (WHOIS) privacy services for any domain for which any site in that domain involves e-commerce." In California and in the European Union, attempting to conceal the identity of the business behind an e-commerce site is a criminal offense.

Individuals have privacy rights. Businesses do not. The EU is very clear on this. The European Privacy Directive covers individual privacy. The European Directive on Electronic Commerce covers business privacy online. They're very different.

Re:ICANN's assault on personal and small business privacy by raquo on Sunday June 28, 2015 @02:26AM (#9792636)
That depends on the definition of "e-commerce", you know. LLCs required to identify themselves – fine.

But an author selling an e-book or a lone developer earning a side income from ads should not be required to publish their home address and cell phone numbers. This is ridiculous.

Somehow I doubt that the definition will be a reasonable one, given everything else in the article.

Re:ICANN's assault on personal and small business privacy by Pyxl101 on Sunday June 28, 2015 @03:44AM (#9792787)
They are not being required to publish their home address or phone number. Businesses are being required to publish their business address. If you're engaged in trade as a business, this is a reasonable requirement. (Otherwise, how do your trading partners reach you if they need to for legal reasons or any other legitimate reason?)

At the same time, it should be perfectly reasonable for a business to hire a registered agent and supply their contact information. The point is that the business be reachable.

Re:ICANN's assault on personal and small business privacy by raquo on Sunday June 28, 2015 @04:00AM (#9792821)
You seem to be talking about registered businesses, while ICANN is targeting all commercial activity, which is much wider.

Why should I be required to publish my home address just because I run ads on my website? If I sell ebooks and someone wants to dispute their purchase they're free to do a chargeback on their card if I run off with their money.

Whatever stupid requirements ICANN introduces, the real scammers will easily bypass them while legitimate sellers will be robbed of their privacy.

Re:ICANN's assault on personal and small business privacy by isoos on Sunday June 28, 2015 @02:30AM (#9792642)
There are business that are almost like self-employments, dressed up as LLC or similar, registered to the home address of the owners. It is very reasonable for them to hide their address and reveal it only to the clients that do buy their services (e.g. on invoice).

I would rather have a restricted whois database, where the authorities can look at the street address, but Average Joe can not.

Re:ICANN's assault on personal and small business privacy by wtbob on Sunday June 28, 2015 @09:55AM (#9793462)
> Individuals have privacy rights. Businesses do not.

That's silly. I, as an individual, am a business: I perform work in return for pay, just as a business provides goods and services in return for payment. If the work I do is writing a blog, and the payment comes from ads or subscriptions, I should be permitted not to have my home address broadcast to all and sundry.

(on a related note, I should also be able to deduct expenses like a business does for tax purposes, but that's a different topic)

Re:ICANN's assault on personal and small business privacy by the8472 on Sunday June 28, 2015 @03:33AM (#9792765)
Often having as little as google ads on your website or a flattr button is considered "commercial activity" by courts.