I appreciate the correction. Edited the comment to reflect that. Weird how the field is fragmented enough that I can go through hundreds of INFOSEC papers (ACM, IEEE, conferences) without seeing hardly anything on honeynets then you see a flood of them in the sources you read. I expect a certain amount of this due to specialization but I think INFOSEC innovation is way too scattered compared to some fields. People end up missing key findings.

It's why I keep toying with the idea of a unified resource for INFOSEC professionals of all these fields. Collection of papers by category, tools, wikis, forum, and so on. Free or cheap to avoid exclusion the way ACM/IEEE/Springer end up causing. The wisdom of our field would be passed down more easily, all stuff in one category would be there with authors maybe discussing it, and different types of researchers would have higher chance of bumping into each other for cross-disciplinary advances. Pretty idealist, I know, but would be great if pulled off.

Epstein at NSF liked the idea but thought you'd need a ton of buy-in from Universities & private parties ahead of time. Haven't solved that one yet...