News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules by baddox on Friday June 26, 2015 @03:55PM (#9787334)
It depends on your definitions. If you consider all legal systems to be "states," including primitive tribal ones, decentralized ones, etc., then yes, "state is a prerequisite for law" is a tautology. But today, "state" usually refers to a relatively large and relatively centralized organization governing a well-specified region that is recognized by other such states. Using that definition, a state is very clearly not a prerequisite for law.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules by pohl on Friday June 26, 2015 @07:24PM (#9788313)
The context that allows a system of laws to operate doesn't just spring forth spontaneously from a vacuum. Rather, it exists because we have a government based on the rule of law.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules by baddox on Friday June 26, 2015 @08:06PM (#9788454)
You didn't address any of the specifics in my comment.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules by pohl on Friday June 26, 2015 @11:01PM (#9788927)
That makes us even.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules by baddox on Saturday June 27, 2015 @12:55AM (#9789173)
I addressed yours directly and in detail. Your claims depend on your definitions.