Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We...
by techiferous on Saturday December 05, 2009 @04:21PM
(#978649)
That's a great point, but the nice thing is that you can actually detect that programatically. If a user always votes both up or down, the software can remind them of how they are supposed to vote.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We...
by Perceval on Saturday December 05, 2009 @05:44PM
(#978766)
Or the software can just ignore people that vote both up or both down. The more interesting and 'telling' votes are those who agree but vote down, or disagree but vote up. Of course, it would behoove pg not to tell the secret, otherwise people would simply game the voting.
Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We...
by palish on Saturday December 05, 2009 @07:00PM
(#978870)
Overengineer much? The current system works.
Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We...
by access_denied on Saturday December 05, 2009 @06:24PM
(#978829)
The best way to disagree is already possible: reply to a comment by stating your opinion. Off course that can have negative effects on signal/noise ratio (or not?).