News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We... by modelic3 on Saturday December 05, 2009 @03:54PM (#978603)
Why is this posted? There is a link for the guidelines at the bottom so what's the point of making a post of it.
[deleted]
Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We... by outotrai on Saturday December 05, 2009 @05:07PM (#978719)
If you expect a comment of yours to be downvoted, perhaps you should consider whether or not the comment in question is actually contributing to the discussion. I imagine that your original comment was downvoted because it expressed your feeling that this was not worthy of submission without including any reasons supporting your opinion. You seem to be surprised, in general, when people disagree with you. Try convincing them, or considering things from their points of view.
Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We... by tokenadult on Saturday December 05, 2009 @05:29PM (#978750)
-4 is the current system-imposed limit. When a comment reaches -4, it's a reasonable inference that there may be many more than five participants willing to downvote it.
Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We... by NathanKP on Saturday December 05, 2009 @09:40PM (#979040)
I wonder what would happen if a similar system was set up for upvotes? I guess that would make it harder to tell the relative worth of valuable comments. Nevermind.... scrap that idea.
Re:Welcome to HN. Please, read 'Hacker News Guidelines.' We... by nudded on Saturday December 05, 2009 @05:28PM (#978745)
-4 is the limit.