News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Adding JIT-compilation to a toy interpreter. Parent comment

Re:Adding JIT-compilation to a toy interpreter by oldmanjay on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @02:42PM (#9773599)
I'm curious, what motivated you to put so much effort into criticizing a clearly marked toy designed as an demonstration of basic techniques?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Adding JIT-compilation to a toy interpreter by DannyBee on Wednesday June 24, 2015 @03:04PM (#9773740)
???? I think you are confused. I'm criticizing the JIT library, not the toy example.

http://developerblog.redhat.com/2015/04/07/jit-compilation-u...

"As the author, I may be biased, but I believe libgccjit makes it relatively easy to build a compiler"

I think this is flat out wrong :)

[ Parent | on HN ]